The court should not have directed plaintiff to produce her phone and all of the material stored on it because defendants failed to meet the threshold for disclosure by showing that their request for plaintiff's cell phone was reasonably calculated to yield information material and necessary to its defense (see Forman v Henkin,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
EVANS v. ROMAN
9292N, 9291.
172 A.D.3d 501 (2019)
100 N.Y.S.3d 26
2019 NY Slip Op 03693
Crystal Evans, Appellant, v. Henry Roman, M.D., Defendant, and Noakita Allen, R.N., et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 9, 2019.
Decided May 9, 2019.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.