Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that his indictment was jurisdictionally defective with respect to the count of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (see Penal Law § 265.02 [7]) because, while the indictment specified that the weapon in question was an assault rifle, it failed to also state that the rifle did not fall into one of the categories of excepted weapons set forth in Penal Law § 265.00 (22) (g...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
