SOTHEBY'S, INC. v. MAO

652283/15.

173 A.D.3d 72 (2019)

100 N.Y.S.3d 27

2019 NY Slip Op 03477

SOTHEBY'S, INC., Appellant-Respondent, v. CHRISTOPHE MAO et al., Respondents-Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

May 2, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, New York City ( Charles G. Moerdler , Ernst H. Rosenberger , Julie G. Matos and Kayley R. McGrath of counsel), and Cahill Cossu Noh & Robinson LLP, New York City ( John R. Cahill and Paul S. Cossu of counsel), for appellant-respondent.

Thomas M. Lahiff , New York City, for respondents-appellants.

RICHTER, KAHN, OING and MOULTON, JJ., concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

The primary issue on this appeal is whether a party to a contract may, by orally waiving the other party's accrued obligation to render a performance when due under the contract (but not the performance itself), extend its time under the statute of limitations in which to sue for breach of contract ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases