Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court erred by not including an expanded interested witness charge in its instructions to the jury is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.