As the motion court found, the construction contract between plaintiff and defendant City broadly precludes delay damages; the exception is delay damages associated with defendant Con Ed's failure to timely provide Specialty Contractors. In opposition to Con Ed's motion, plaintiff submitted evidence sufficient to raise an issue of fact whether the delays outlined in claims 4, 5 and 16 of the 48 claims in its bill of particulars are attributable to the unavailability of Con...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
