The court correctly dismissed plaintiff's first cause of action for breach of the warranty of habitability, brought pursuant to Real Property Law § 235-b (1), because DZC and MSC were not plaintiff's landlord or the lessor of plaintiff's apartment. The second and third causes of action for breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment and breach of contract, respectively, were similarly correctly dismissed based upon the absence of a contractual or landlord tenant relationship...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
