Defendants established prima facie that plaintiff did not suffer a serious injury to his cervical or lumbar spine through the affirmed reports of their radiologist and neurologist, who found that plaintiff's CT scans were normal, plaintiff had full range of motion, and there was no evidence of traumatic injury (see Holloman v American United Transp. Inc.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MENDOZA v. L. TWO GO, INC.
8887, 304454/14.
171 A.D.3d 462 (2019)
96 N.Y.S.3d 576
2019 NY Slip Op 02613
Hayden E. Mendoza, Appellant, v. L. Two Go, Inc., et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided April 4, 2019.
Decided April 4, 2019.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
