The court did not abuse its discretion in granting plaintiff an extension of time to serve appellant with process in the interest of justice (CPLR 306-b). Plaintiff established the existence of several relevant factors weighing in favor of an extension (Leader v Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer,
The claims asserted against Laslop seem to be potentially meritorious (Solano v Mendez,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.