1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 169 A.D.3d
  5. 169 A.D.3d 179 (2019)
 

CITY OF UTICA (SUPRUNCHIK)

1088 CA 18-00641.

169 A.D.3d 179 (2019)

92 N.Y.S.3d 827

2019 NY Slip Op 01020

In the Matter of the FORECLOSURE OF TAX LIENS BY PROCEEDING IN REM PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 11 OF THE REAL PROPERTY TAX LAW BY THE CITY OF UTICA, Respondent. VLADIMIR SUPRUNCHIK, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.

Decided February 8, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David G. Goldbas , Utica, for appellant.

William M. Borrill , Corporation Counsel, Utica ( Kathryn Hartnett of counsel), for respondent.

WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, PERADOTTO and DEJOSEPH, JJ. concur.

OPINION OF THE COURT

The issue before us is whether Supreme Court erred in denying that part of respondent's application that sought to vacate for lack of jurisdiction a default judgment, entered in a tax foreclosure proceeding pursuant to RPTL article 11, insofar as that judgment deemed abandoned certain items of personal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases