Defendants established that the county designated by plaintiff was improper by submitting, inter alia, plaintiff's Department of Motor Vehicle records, hospital records, tax returns for 2007 through 2011, the accident report, plaintiff's 2009 employment records and his 2009 W-4 and W-2 forms, all of which indicated that he resided in Westchester County at the time he commenced the action (see Gruenwald v Polatseck,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
CROVATO v. H&M HENNES & MAURITZ, L.P.
8326N. 304191/10. 83792/11. 83835/12.
169 A.D.3d 415 (2019)
91 N.Y.S.3d 693
2019 NY Slip Op 00840
Craig Crovato, Respondent, v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. (And Third-Party Actions.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 5, 2019.
Decided February 5, 2019.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
