The court providently exercised its discretion in determining that plaintiff's disclosure, in a supplemental bill of particulars, that surgery had been recommended for his spine did not warrant compelling pre-operative and post-operative depositions or physical examinations at that time, and it was warranted in granting the motion only to the extent of directing plaintiff to provide authorizations for medical records pertaining to his continuing treatment (see Jenkins...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
