The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. Defendant approached a police officer and began a conversation, during which defendant volunteered facts that would support an inference that he had committed a larceny. Moreover, defendant's demeanor and evasive answers to the officer's questions raised the officer's level of suspicion. Accordingly, the officer had, at least, a founded suspicion of criminality that justified his common-law inquiry requesting additional...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
