1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 167 A.D.3d
  5. 167 A.D.3d 441 (2018)
 

BURGUND v. CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, INC.

7814. 155887/14.

167 A.D.3d 441 (2018)

87 N.Y.S.3d 473

2018 NY Slip Op 08354

James Burgund, Respondent, v. Cushman & Wakefield, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided December 6, 2018.

The record demonstrates that defendant property manager C & W was a statutory agent of the property owner (Verizon) and general contractor with respect to plaintiff's claims under Labor Law §§ 200 and 241 (6), but not as to the Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action. C & W's manager testified that he oversaw general operations in Verizon's building, including offering managerial aid to Verizon's employees, like...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases