DILEK v. ROZENHOLC

7698. 652956/11.

167 A.D.3d 437 (2018)

90 N.Y.S.3d 37

2018 NY Slip Op 08349

Emel Dilek et al., Appellants, v. David Rozenholc et al., Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided December 6, 2018.


Plaintiff Dilek was neither a signatory nor an intended third-party beneficiary of the 2009 agreement, and therefore lacks standing to sue for breach of that contract. On plaintiff Russo's prior appeal, we found that the estate of Ronald Pecunies "stepped into decedent's shoes" for purposes of Russo's breach of contract claim (Russo v Rozenholc, 130 A.D.3d 492, 496 [1st Dept 2015]). Russo — the estate's representative —...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases