Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the Supreme Court improperly permitted a detective, who was not a witness to the crimes in question, to testify that, in his opinion, the person depicted in a surveillance video with the victim was the defendant (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Alleyne,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.