PEOPLE v. CADE

7437. 1058/13.

165 A.D.3d 551 (2018)

84 N.Y.S.3d 358

2018 NY Slip Op 07067

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James Cade, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided October 23, 2018.


Defendant's claim that the court's explanation of his rights under Boykin v Alabama (395 U.S. 238 [1969]) was deficient is unpreserved, and does not fall within the narrow exception to the preservation requirement (see People v Conceicao, 26 N.Y.3d 375, 381-382 [2015]). We decline to review this claim in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that the court correctly stated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases