The record demonstrates that building owner Bronx 360 and manager T.U.C. were aware that the building's elevator was malfunctioning on the day of plaintiff's accident. That day was the third consecutive day on which Uplift was performing repairs to the elevator, pursuant to its maintenance agreement with Bronx 360. Issues of fact exist whether Bronx 360 and T.U.C. breached their duty to warn of a dangerous condition on the premises (see Piluso v Bell Atl. Corp.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
POLANCO v. BRONX 360 REALTY LLC
7116. 303568/11.
164 A.D.3d 1166 (2018)
82 N.Y.S.3d 24
2018 NY Slip Op 06210
Hector Polanco, Respondent, v. Bronx 360 Realty LLC et al., Appellants, and Uplift Elevator Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided September 25, 2018.
Decided September 25, 2018.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
