1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 164 A.D.3d
  5. 164 A.D.3d 739 (2018)
 

CAMUSO v. BROOKLYN PORTFOLIO, LLC

2016-03448. Index Nos. 19269/13, 507818/13.

164 A.D.3d 739 (2018)

83 N.Y.S.3d 160

2018 NY Slip Op 05818

Henry F. Camuso, Respondent, v. Brooklyn Portfolio, LLC, Appellant, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Brooklyn Portfolio, LLC, Appellant, v. Regent Associates et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided August 22, 2018.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for the entry of a judgment declaring that the contract of sale is null and void and unenforceable.

In January 1988, Henry Camuso and Arthur Gallinaro, along with two other individuals, executed a written agreement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases