Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention, raised in his main brief and pro se supplemental brief, that the identification evidence was legally insufficient to support his convictions of robbery in the first degree, is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v Hawkins,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.