Although the court did not specify the degree of harassment it found respondent to have committed, a fair preponderance of the evidence supports a finding of harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.26 [3]), one of the enumerated offenses upon which the issuance of an order of protection may be premised (Family Ct Act § 812 [1]; see Matter of Lorin F. v Jason D.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.