Plaintiff seeks to hold defendant ASICS liable for the balance of payment due for work it performed at an ASICS store pursuant to a contract with defendant Windsor Financial Group, LLC, ASICS's franchisee.
There is no basis in the complaint and supporting materials for applying the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil, which indeed plaintiff did not rely on (see generally Matter of Morris v New York State Dept. of Taxation & Fin.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
