1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.3d
  4. 31 N.Y.3d
  5. 31 N.Y.3d 372 (2018)
 

2138747 ONTARIO v. SAMSUNG

No. 57.

31 N.Y.3d 372 (2018)

103 N.E.3d 774

78 N.Y.S.3d 703

2018 NY Slip Op 04274

2138747 ONTARIO, INC., Appellant, v. SAMSUNG C&T CORPORATION et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Decided June 12, 2018.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Susman Godfrey L.L.P., New York City ( Jacob W. Buchdahl , William Christopher Carmody , Shawn J. Rabin and Cory S. Buland of counsel), and Ressler & Ressler, New York City ( Ellen R. Werther and Bruce J. Ressler of counsel), for appellant.

Baker & McKenzie LLP, New York City ( Grant A. Hanessian and Jacob M. Kaplan of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On this appeal, we must determine whether CPLR 202 — New York's borrowing statute — applies when contracting parties have agreed that their contract would be "enforced" according to New York law. We conclude that it does.

I.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases