Respondent challenges the constitutionality of the financial support requirement of Domestic Relations Law § 111 (1) (d). As an initial matter, we cannot, on this record, determine the adequacy of the notice he provided the Attorney General (see Executive Law § 71; CPLR 1012 [b]). In any event, we find that respondent furnishes no grounds to find the statute unconstitutional. He contends it violates equal protection guarantees by imposing a threshold requirement...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
