The court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress statements. The record supports the court's factual determination that defendant's comprehension of English was sufficient to enable him to understand his Miranda rights, and that his confession was otherwise voluntary (see People v Jin Cheng Lin,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. MENA
6605, 1496/11.
161 A.D.3d 542 (2018)
78 N.Y.S.3d 102
2018 NY Slip Op 03599
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Victor Mena, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 17, 2018.
Decided May 17, 2018.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.