Defendant established that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury involving significant or permanent consequential limitations of use of his cervical spine or lumbar spine through the affirmed report of her expert orthopedist, who found normal ranges of motion and no objective evidence of traumatic injury in the subject body parts, and opined that any injury to these body parts had resolved (see Reyes v Se Park,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
HENRY v. CARR
6455, 305645/14.
161 A.D.3d 424 (2018)
76 N.Y.S.3d 145
2018 NY Slip Op 03208
Kashaun Henry, Respondent, v. Xucia Carr, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 3, 2018.
Decided May 3, 2018.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.