KASZAR v. CHO

6268 800008/15.

160 A.D.3d 501 (2018)

71 N.Y.S.3d 355

2018 NY Slip Op 02555

Carol Kaszar, Respondent, v. Samuel K. Cho, M.D., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided April 12, 2018.


Although it is true that a motion to renew should generally be based upon newly-discovered facts, this rule is not inflexible, and the court has discretion to grant renewal in the interest of justice even upon facts that were known to the movant at the time the original motion was made (Rancho Santa Fe Assn. v Dolan-King, 36 A.D.3d 460, 461 [1st Dept 2007]). Here, we decline to interfere with the court's discretionary decision to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases