MATTER OF DOE v. ZUCKER

6240 452448/16.

160 A.D.3d 470 (2018)

71 N.Y.S.3d 350

2018 NY Slip Op 02429

In the Matter of John Doe, Petitioner, v. Howard Zucker et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided April 10, 2018.


Petitioner contends that he is entitled to the benefits sought because he has a substantial handicap that prevents him from parenting his child. Respondents dispute that he would be entitled to benefits on that basis. Assuming arguendo, without deciding, that petitioner would be entitled to benefits on that basis, petitioner failed to meet his burden of proof that he was entitled to these benefits, as he failed to show that he has engaged in parenting his child, or that his...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases