Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention, in effect, that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his convictions because the complainant's testimony was not corroborated is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, it is without merit. Contrary to the defendant's contention, corroboration of the complainant's sworn testimony was not required under Penal Law §§ 130.16 and 260.11 because...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.