CPLR 2303 (a) provides, in relevant part, that "[a] subpoena requiring attendance or a subpoena duces tecum shall be served in the same manner as a summons." Here, plaintiff admitted that he did not properly serve Chin with the trial subpoena. Because service was improper, there was no lawful judicial order in effect for Chin to disobey (see El-Dehdan v El-Dehdan,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
WHITFIELD v. Q-BORO BOOKS
5937N 400242/11.
159 A.D.3d 474 (2018)
70 N.Y.S.3d 52
2018 NY Slip Op 01552
JOHN WHITFIELD, Appellant, v. Q-BORO BOOKS et al., Defendants. PAUL A. CHIN, ESQ., Nonparty Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 8, 2018.
Decided March 8, 2018.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
