Defendant's right to be sentenced without unreasonable delay was not violated by the passage of 2½ years between his original sentencing proceeding and his resentencing (see CPL 380.30 [1]). The prompt original proceeding had all the characteristics of a sentencing, including defendant's presence and his opportunity to be heard, except that in granting defendant's request for a brief stay of execution of the agreed-upon sentence, the court neglected to formally...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
