The motion court correctly ruled that the alleged oral agreement between plaintiff and Habacus for a share of the company's profits during the duration of plaintiff's employment did not violate the statute of frauds. Plaintiff testified that the profit-sharing agreement was for the duration of his employment, which was at will and thus could have been
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.