The second motion court providently exercised its discretion in granting the People's motion for consolidation. Given the issue of intent, proof relating to each incident was admissible with regard to the other (see CPL 200.20 [2] [b]).
Defendant's principal argument on appeal is that the order granting consolidation after another court of coordinate jurisdiction had denied the motion constituted a violation of the law of the case doctrine. However, defendant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.