The defendant contends that the resentencing court erred in imposing a period of postrelease supervision of 5 years rather than 2½ years after it allegedly promised to impose the "minimum allowable" period of postrelease supervision. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the court did not misapprehend its sentencing discretion with respect to that period, since the only period...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
