Defendant did not preserve his claim that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish that the victim's injury occurred in the course of a robbery, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject it on the merits. We also reject defendant's preserved challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence establishing that the injury rose to the level of "[p]hysical injury" (Penal Law § 10.00 [9]), and find that the verdict...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
