Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly found that the determination of the New York City Water Board was not arbitrary and capricious, as the petitioners' April 2012 objection to a water and wastewater bill from April 2005 was barred by the four-year limitations period set forth in the New York City Water Board Rate Schedule (see Matter of Clinton Mews Owners Corp. v New York City Water Bd.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.