Respondent DCAS is not a necessary party (see CPLR 1001 [a]). It had delegated its responsibility for determining the medical fitness of employees like petitioner Jordan well before Jordan applied for reinstatement, and was not involved in NYCHA's denial of the application; the court's determination completely resolves the controversy between the parties (compare City of New York v Long Is. Airports Limousine Serv. Corp.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF JORDAN v. NEW YORK CITY HOUS. AUTH.
4867, 100993/14.
154 A.D.3d 618 (2017)
2017 NY Slip Op 07554
64 N.Y.S.3d 201
In the Matter of EILEEN JORDAN et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, Appellant-Respondent, et al., Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 31, 2017.
Decided October 31, 2017.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.