A fair preponderance of the evidence establishes that respondent committed the family offense of harassment in the second degree (see Family Ct Act §§ 812, 832). Petitioner testified that, inter alia, respondent intentionally engaged in a course of conduct in 2013 and 2016 to alarm or seriously annoy her for no legitimate purpose (see Penal Law § 240.26 [3]), and there exists no basis to disturb the court's credibility determinations (see e...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
