MOSKOWITZ v. HICKEY

4783N, 155593/14.

154 A.D.3d 585 (2017)

2017 NY Slip Op 07405

62 N.Y.S.3d 268

ROBERT MOSKOWITZ, Respondent, v. EILEEN HICKEY, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided October 24, 2017.


The motion court providently exercised its discretion in striking Hickey's answer on account of her failure to comply with three successive court orders directing her to respond to plaintiff's discovery demands (see Loeb v Assara N.Y. I L.P., 118 A.D.3d 457 [1st Dept 2014]; Oasis Sportswear, Inc. v Rego, 95 A.D.3d 592 [1st Dept 2012]). In response...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases