MATTER OF STATE v. FLOYD Y.

No. 102.

30 N.Y.3d 963 (2017)

2017 NY Slip Op 07381

In the Matter of STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FLOYD Y., Appellant.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Decided October 24, 2017.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marvin Bernstein , Mental Hygiene Legal Service, First Department, New York City ( Alexandra H. Keeling , Maura M. Klugman and Sadie Zea Ishee of counsel), for appellant.

Eric T. Schneiderman , Attorney General, New York City ( Matthew W. Grieco , Barbara D. Underwood and Steven C. Wu of counsel), for respondent.

Chief Judge DIFIORE and Judges RIVERA, STEIN, FAHEY, GARCIA and FEINMAN concur; Judge WILSON dissents in an opinion.


OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The judgment appealed from and the order of the Appellate Division brought up for review should be affirmed, without costs.

Considering the evidence "in the light most favorable to the State" (Matter of State of New York v John S., 23 N.Y.3d 326, 348 [2014]), as we must, the evidence at respondent's retrial (see Matter of State of New York v Floyd Y.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases