The testimony of the expert forensic psychologist and both parties provides a sound and substantial evidentiary basis for Family Court's determination that there has been no change in circumstances warranting modification of existing orders and that it is not in the best interests of the subject child for petitioner to have unsupervised visitation with him (see Matter
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF JAMES K.T. v. LAVERNE W.
4631.
154 A.D.3d 471 (2017)
62 N.Y.S.3d 111
2017 NY Slip Op 07097
In the Matter of JAMES K.T., Appellant, v. LAVERNE W., Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 10, 2017.
Decided October 10, 2017.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.