Dismissal of the complaint was proper where plaintiff failed to create any triable issue of fact as to whether defendant made a misrepresentation to him that defendant knew was false in order to induce him to accept a position as a sales manager in defendant's Watches and Fine Jewelry (WFJ) Department, allegedly in order to steal plaintiff's high end clients (see Mandarin Trading Ltd. v Wildenstein,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
EVATZ v. CHANEL, INC.
4582, 101284/11.
154 A.D.3d 434 (2017)
61 N.Y.S.3d 231
2017 NY Slip Op 06915
JOHN EVATZ, Appellant, v. CHANEL, INC., Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 3, 2017.
Decided October 3, 2017.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
