Plaintiff has abandoned his Labor Law § 240 (1) claims as against EDC and Hudson by failing to address the motion court's conclusion that those particular defendants could not be held liable for any violations of the statute.
The motion court correctly dismissed the Labor Law § 240 (1) claim as against the City of New York, because the statute does not cover plaintiff's injury, namely pain allegedly caused by his repeated work, over the course of weeks,...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
