Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant waived his contention that the Supreme Court erred in permitting the prosecution to elicit evidence of an alleged uncharged drug transaction by consenting to the court's ruling that such evidence would be admissible, with appropriate jury instructions, to complete the narrative of events, and by then using that evidence on cross-examination (see People v Genyard,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.