PEOPLE v. EVERY

No. 133 SSM 20.

29 N.Y.3d 1103 (2017)

83 N.E.3d 202

61 N.Y.S.3d 194

2017 NY Slip Op 06401

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DOUGLAS R. EVERY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Decided September 5, 2017.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Easton Thompson Kasperek Shiffrin LLP, Rochester ( William T. Easton and Danielle C. Wild of counsel), for appellant.

Kirk O. Martin , District Attorney, Owego, for respondent.

Chief Judge DIFIORE and Judges RIVERA, STEIN, FAHEY, GARCIA, WILSON and FEINMAN concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant has failed to meet his burden of "demonstrat[ing] the absence of strategic or other legitimate explanations for counsel's alleged failure[s]" (People v Wragg, 26 N.Y.3d 403, 409 [2015]) and, thus, he cannot prevail on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim. His assertions that County Court erred in charging the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases