The court providently exercised its discretion in permitting three officers who were familiar with defendant, but were not eyewitnesses, to give lay opinion testimony, as an aid to the jury's identification process, that defendant was the man depicted in surveillance videotapes firing a handgun. This testimony "served to aid the jury in making an independent assessment regarding whether the man in the [videos] was indeed the defendant" (People v Russell,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. BOYD
4376. 5195N/12.
151 A.D.3d 641 (2017)
2017 NY Slip Op 05191
58 N.Y.S.3d 43
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DOMINIQUE BOYD, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 27, 2017.
Decided June 27, 2017.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
