Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
There is no merit to the defendant's contention that the Supreme Court erred in charging the jury on the crime of burglary in the first degree under the theory that the defendant unlawfully remained in the complainant's dwelling with the intent to commit a crime therein, rather than the theory that he unlawfully entered the complainant's dwelling with the intent to commit a crime therein (see People v Graves,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.