1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.3d
  4. 29 N.Y.3d
  5. 29 N.Y.3d 1051 (2017)
 

WILSON v. DANTAS

No. 62.

29 N.Y.3d 1051 (2017)

80 N.E.3d 1032

58 N.Y.S.3d 286

2017 NY Slip Op 04387

ROBERT E. WILSON, III, Respondent, v. DANIEL VALENTE DANTAS et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Decided June 6, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, New York City ( Philip C. Korologos and Paul Fattaruso of counsel), for appellants.

Lankford & Reed, P.L.L.C., Alexandria, Virginia ( Terrance G. Reed , of the Virginia bar, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), Langrock Sperry & Wool, LLP, Middlebury, Vermont ( Peter F. Langrock , of the Vermont bar, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), and K&L Gates, New York City ( Martin F. Gusy and Matthew J. Weldon of counsel), for respondent.

Chief Judge DIFIORE and Judges RIVERA, STEIN and FAHEY concur; Judge WILSON dissents in an opinion; Judge GARCIA taking no part.

OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. Defendants have expressly abandoned their personal jurisdiction claims in their appeal to this Court. Their remaining claims, to the extent reviewable on this appeal, are without merit (see CPLR 3211 [a] [7]; Leon v Martinez, 84 N.Y.2d 83

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases