In this pro se action alleging fraud, conspiracy, conversion and defamation by defendants in connection with their legal representation of plaintiff Prince Oparaji in an underlying motor vehicle accident, defendants, by their service of a motion to dismiss the action, made within the time extension granted by the court, did not default, contrary to plaintiffs' contentions (see generally CPLR 320 [a]; 2211, 3211 [a]; see also Urena v NYNEX, Inc.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
OPARAJI v. YABLON
4052. 102264/15. M-1974.
151 A.D.3d 415 (2017)
2017 NY Slip Op 04363
52 N.Y.S.3d 857
PRINCE OPARAJI et al., Appellants, v. LAWRENCE T. YABLON et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 1, 2017.
Decided June 1, 2017.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
