CHAME v. KRONEN

4136. 24265/13E.

150 A.D.3d 622 (2017)

2017 NY Slip Op 04227

55 N.Y.S.3d 228

SALLY CHAME, Respondent, v. SHELDON KRONEN, Respondent, and ANDRES CHAME, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided May 30, 2017.


Chame established his entitlement to summary judgment by showing that there is no triable issue of fact as to whether his vehicle was stopped when codefendant Sheldon Kronen's vehicle rear-ended him. Plaintiff, Chame and Kronen all testified that Chame's vehicle was stopped before the impact occurred, which renders Kronen's claim that Chame failed to activate his vehicle's turn signal irrevelant (see Vespe v Kazi, 62 A.D.3d 408,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases