1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 150 A.D.3d
  5. 150 A.D.3d 548 (2017)
 

MATTER OF CAMARA v. SKANSKA, INC.

4063N. 163157/15.

150 A.D.3d 548 (2017)

2017 NY Slip Op 04057

55 N.Y.S.3d 27

In the Matter of FRANCISCO L. CAMARA, Respondent, v. SKANSKA, INC., et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided May 18, 2017.

Although respondents have already largely complied with petitioner's pre-action disclosure requests, respondents still have an ongoing obligation to "amend or supplement" their responses (CPLR 3101 [h]), and the order imposes additional outstanding disclosure obligations. Accordingly, the order has potential continuing practical consequences to respondents and their appeal is not moot (see Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases